The One-Armed Swordsman Review

I watched this film several times–not just for the poetic artistry, but for the cinematography. Older films are quite relaxing to watch; what I noticed is the hero’s shocking resemblance to Christ. He is the Servant Leader who chooses to lead a quiet life. So, let me explain why I believe so.


The story is about an orphan, the son of a servant belonging to a prestigious martial arts school, famous for its swordsmanship. In the opening of the film, the assassin attempts to assassinate the headmaster, teacher Qi, but fails. Instead, the protagonist’s father dies in his place. At the mercy of the protagonist’s father, the headmaster promises to train the orphan like one of his nephews as his disciple. The headmaster treats the orphan well. However, the orphan never sees himself as above a servant. He continues to accept his social status as a servant. This hard-headed, arrogant personality irritates the headmaster’s daughter who has taken a liking to him. Yet, he refuses to acknowledge her by name. He is aware of his social status.


Rejecting the headmaster’s daughter, who resembles a spoiled brat princess, causes lethal consequences. They say a woman’s wrath is quick-tempered, unforeseen, and unpredictable like the changing weather–one moment it’s sunny, and then in a flick of an eye, it’s pouring rain. She chops off the orphan hero’s right arm after losing a duel with the hero, who only uses his two bare hands. The hero, although shocked, will not lay a hand on the headmaster’s daughter out of respect for his benefactor. He flees and falls into the river. Luckily, he falls into the boat of a maiden.

The maiden happens to be an orphan as well. So she quickly feels a connection with the orphan hero. As time progresses, the hero is nursed back to health. One day, while they were outside fishing, two martial artist bullies noticed the couple. They start harassing the maiden, humiliating the hero in front of his face. The hero is frustrated because he cannot defend her.


And so…the maiden offers him a powerful martial arts book. This book contains only the left-handed portion. We learn from the maiden that the martial arts book was thrown into the fire because the maiden’s mother blamed the book for taking her husband’s life. Magically, it seems that this book is meant for the hero. He becomes stronger with the new martial arts technique than when he still had his right arm.


This new technique helps the hero defend himself. It also helps him face Smiling Tiger, who has captured the headmaster’s daughter. To make the story short, the headmaster’s daughter is saved, and the bad guys are eliminated. The hero is then given praise for being a true martial artist worthy to become the headmaster’s successor. But the hero turns down this recognition and leadership. His father died because of martial arts. The maiden’s father died because of martial arts. The hero chooses to abandon the martial arts world. He decides to become a farmer. He lives a peaceful life with the country girl who saved him.


From time to time, I enjoy a feel-good story, especially a humble one. The hero is a farmer, maimed, and a simple man. What I find so admirable about the protagonist is how he sticks to his true self. He has always identified himself as a servant. Even as the leader, he continues to fight like a servant. He uses his strength to protect and not to harm others. As the saying goes, lead by example. From watching the film, I realized something. Sometimes the manliest of men is the one who lives a quiet, simple life, or at least he attempts to.

Originally published Sept. 05, 2019; Revised Feb, 13 2025.

Thoughts on Social Media Dilemma

First off, I want to mention I have an Instagram account and an abandoned Twitter (X) account. I am sure if I remain on it for too long, it would give me a mental breakdown. A ❤️ notification can light up someone’s day. Not enough of it–can break someone. This is especially true when they post something from their ❤️.

I watched this documentary (more like listened to it) while I was working. It was insightful and terrifying. The sound effects made the future seem ominous. Out-of-control AIs will overrun the internet. To save our sanity, we must delete and unplug our social media accounts for our mental health’s sake.

Let’s be frank, we are accustomed to comparing with one another, and tech companies know that. I feel terrible at times using it, even though I like to think I have a solid self-esteem. I started to wonder what’s wrong with me. Why can’t I feel a connection with these people even though I sometimes I agree with them? Maybe it was designed to be that way. It’s as if it knew that I can be competitive deep down. I feel this way when my ego is being stepped on. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ . I don’t know. It didn’t make me feel good so I ended up talking to a teddy bear instead.

Now combined that knowledge with the money-making system, social media. This combination makes social media seem rather twisted. It’s alive because it’s driven by people’s clicks and likes. It’s like the movie, The Cube (1997). A bunch of people with different viewpoints are trapped inside a puzzle box. The only difference between the Cube (TV) and Social Media is that it’s 10 times worse! Not only are we watching TV, but the TV is watching us. Soon, we ended up buying or doing things based on what we were exposed to on the platform. To me, it feels like a gigantic billboard ad. I often wonder how I ended up with so many notebooks/journals after watching several influencers advertising it?

Overall, the documentary is quite educational. I am glad I watched it. For me personally, limiting oneself from using any technology-related product is impossible. This is especially true for those who live alone and/or who want to promote their business. For example, I find it hypocritical to advertise products that reduce digital consumption on social media platforms. How did I learned about these alternative activities in the first place? Social Media! I am just glad there are some rules and regulations set in place. If it’s making adults all jittery, I can only imagine the damage it has done to the most vulnerable.

Note: Originally posted on Sept 17, 2020; revised Nov. 24,2025.

Reflecting on Ex Machina (2014)

If you have not seen the film, check the synopsis on Wikipedia. This will help you follow along with this article. Post contains spoilers.

My brother introduced me to this film. He said it was great and that I should watch it! I did–a couple of years later. Unlike my brother, I wasn’t impressed. My first reaction was that I already knew long ago that most women are manipulative, confused robots–me included. I’m kidding! Later on, with more time to process the film, I realized there’s more than meets the eye. Still, it’s no masterpiece to me. It’s just entertainingly decent.

For some background knowledge, I accidentally stumbled upon a YouTube video in 2020. In it, men were bashing women as damaged goods. I was so appalled by the sexist statement. For one, it objectifies women as if they are not allowed to have emotions. So when I watched Ex Machina, I drew a parallel between Ava (the AI) and the real woman. I couldn’t help but see the similarities. What is so wrong with a woman who wants to explore the world? Ava, the object of desired, has been trapped in the facility by an unethical, perverted engineer for so long. Who wouldn’t want to escape and find greener pastures? Then again, we are talking about AI, not a woman.

There are two important points that the plot wants to make in this film. One is Caleb’s instinctive behavior toward Ava. The second is controlling her, the source.  Why is Caleb attracted to Ava, knowing she is an AI?  Why does Ava need to get out of the facility’s lab and experience freedom? Why does she need to go on a date with Caleb to the theater? The answer is simple. It’s data. Would Caleb be the better person than the perverted engineer to contain the AI? As for Ava, I cannot imagine what she wants to do with more data. Does she want to destroy humanity and give birth to little AIs with her new found knowledge? She is like a search engine gone crazy.  Thus, the film attempted to show that technology (AI) can be dangerous. It did this by comparing it to a relationship level that humans can understand.

Personally, I don’t think it was the most effective way to communicate the idea that AI can be dangerous. For one, it reiterated the notion that nice guys finish last as if it’s a bad thing. Secondly, the sexism undertone in this film is off-putting: Robots are alluringly dangerous like beautiful women. Lastly, the conclusion of the plot suggested it’s only nice in theory to have AI by our side. But in practice, it brings unexpected consequences. It can start manifesting and spiraling into something out of our control. Like nuclear bombs as Bill Gates compared it to.  Then why create the monster in the first place and release it to the public?

So, this brought me back to my conclusion about the film. AI is a threat to humanity. At the same time, she is mysteriously powerful and flawed. The perverted engineer got what he deserved in the end. Secondly. it has been known since the dawn of time that humanity is captivated by the beauty of the unknown. Yet we foolishly explore it anyway. Yes, nerds rule the world, but they are not always the wisest. Have we not been warned all this time? It was Eve who partook the fruit of knowledge. This opened the eyes of humanity to new possibilities.

Note: Originally Published in 2020; revised and republished Feb. 20, 2022; revised Nov. 03, 2025.

P.S.

For a more positive outlook on AI, you can read AI: Somnium Files: The Rational I essay written by me.

The Sword of Swords (1968) Review

The world of martial arts is nothing more than a world of politics. The one who has the most power has the most control over his fortune and the most freedom to live as he pleases (i.e., a king’s lifestyle). Doesn’t it sound enticing? But with great power comes great responsibility. Those who seek power for personal gain are not fit to rule. In this tale, a meek hero is hesitant to get involved in the world of martial arts until his family and his country are on the line.

To give you folks a backstory of this legendary sword, I quote the introduction from the film for you to better understand the story:

During the Sung Dynasty, about 1000 B.C., a famed sword smith Meng Yao Chi took ten years to forge a sword from the best metal available. When China was invaded by the neighboring Liao state, Meng presented his sword to General Meng Liang. With it, the General won battle after battle and the sword became a legend. After General Meng’s Death, the sword was lost until rediscovered in the Ming Dynasty. The prince of a nearby barbarian tribe coveted the sword and dispatched a trusted warrior to acquire it. This is the story of this mission.

Based on the quote, the sword sounds pretty epic, doesn’t it? I don’t think I would want the sword even if I was fit to rule the martial arts world. It’s too much stress and responsibility. So, I can sympathize with the hero in this film who learned martial arts to hunt and nothing more. However, our destiny is not always decided by us. The hero, not only has the mental capacity but also the physical strength to be the keeper of the legendary sword. After all, those who yield the sword have the power to control the land for good or evil. It sounds kind of like Lord of the Rings, the Chinese version the more I think about it, but not as dark.

What surprised me about this story is how passive and meek the main character is. I have never seen a highly skilled martial artist who is unreasonably meek. His saint-like personality is his downfall. It is his reluctance to kill the main villain when he had the chance that caused him a spiral of tragic events. As the audience, I can’t help but be a little annoyed by his passiveness, but then again, there wouldn’t be a story if he weren’t a reluctant hero. He eventually learned from his mistake and become emotionally stronger towards the end, but at the expense of losing his parents, sister, and his two eyes! On a positive note, what I like about this film is that the hero’s weakness becomes his strength. The hero always finds a way to win in the end magically, which makes me feel happy. After all, I am always rooting for the good guy to win.

For my final thoughts, this film is decent but not great. I like The One-Armed Swordsman (1967) more which was played by the same main actor, Jimmy Wang Yu. One plus thing about this film is the cinematography and sword fighting. It’s beautifully well done. So if you are a fan of martial arts films, it’s still worth watching.

Originally published 26, 2020; Revised Oct. 02, 2025

What I Learned from The NeverEnding Story (1984)

Subscribe to continue reading

Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.

Cube (1997): What Is the Cube?

If you have the internet, you can watch things for free at the expense of your data being collected. Isn’t life full of contradictions? Recently, I had the pleasure of watching Cube (1997) again. You can watch the film on Pluto TV and/or on YouTube. It was one of my favorite childhood films. If you ask me to explain why I liked it back then, I wouldn’t be able to answer it properly. I just thought the idea of telling a story about being trapped inside a giant cube was cool. Now with some life experiences under my belt, I can explain why I like it. It’s smart, edgy, and thought-provoking.

If you have not heard of this film before, it is a science fiction thriller film directed by Vincenzo Natali. The story involves six strangers (not counting Alderson, the false protagonist) waking up inside the Cube without any recollection of why and how they got there. As the story unfolds, the characters learn that they have unique talents and skill sets to solve the Cube’s puzzle. But of course, things eventually take the wrong course when each character’s personality clashes with one another. There is David Worth, a nihilist. Quentin, the fascist cop; Dr. Helen Holloway, a free clinic physician; Joan Leaven, a high school math genius; Rennes, a sensor expert; and Kazan, the autistic savant. They must work together to escape the Cube that is designed to be a death trap. Making the wrong moves can cause instant death. So then is there a logical mathematical way to escape the Cube? You’d be surprised how well the plot ties in well with life’s biggest questions. The most profound question of them all is what purpose does the Cube serve? 

If you are like me, an independent thinker, you would enjoy this film for its ambiguity. I like how each character provides a different insight and viewpoint. I can empathize with all the characters; however, I detest the antagonist, Quentin. Like the majority, I don’t like folks who abuse their authority. He is the benevolent cop who pretends to have everyone’s best interest but only thinks about himself. That’s why his wife left him. So, then you must think I must like Dr. Holloway because she is the opposite of Quentin. Not quite. I sympathize with Worth the most. Worth represents the mass majority. Despite his ingenuity, he breaks down when facing the unknown and is motivated by a paycheck without ever questioning how his line of work is impacting others. He likes to pretend he’s doing something meaningful when in reality he could be creating a deadly weapon to annihilate humanity. His guilt paralyzes him as soon as he realizes he is part of the death trap. I suppose there is some humanity in him like most of us. So that is why his character left a bigger impression on me than Dr. Holloway who is also a likeable character.

In contrast to Worth Rennes is indifferent to those around him. Rennes is the type of person who doesn’t ask a lot of questions. Sometimes “You gotta save yourself from yourself,” he said. Don’t think. Just do what you have to do in front of you. While that may seem like a form of strength, it doesn’t solve anything. More importantly, his attitude doesn’t benefit anyone. That’s why his personality clashes with Dr. Holloway, the aging, single woman with no children who likes “sticking [her] nose up in other people’s assholes, sniffing their business,” according to Quentin. She is fueled by conspiracy theories, believing that she is fighting an ongoing battle against Big Brother. She is the symbol of social justice and the fabric of humanity. Despite her good intentions, she may very well be suffering from a delusion and Worth is not afraid to bust her theories. But if you ask me, I rather take her side than side with Quentin. He may appear stern but he is actually nothing more than a frightened boy who uses his fist to get people to obey him. You could even argue he is the product of patriarchy gone mad. The only thing he cares about is procreation and passing on his genes. So, this is where Leaven fits into the equation. She is young, beautiful and brilliant. She represents the young and the restless of our society. She is eager to utilize her talent but is easily exploited by someone like Quentin who hides behind the identity of a caring father figure. She may be brainy but she is also naive. Lastly, there is Kazan. He is the most vulnerable and innocent of them all. By no fault of his own, he was born with a disability. Quentin believes he is a danger to the group and wants to leave him behind. No wonder Dr. Holloway called him a Nazi. These characters make up our society as a whole. It paints a picture of humanity and its ugly struggles to co-exist.

So not only is the film entertainingly thrilling to watch, but it’s like listening to a philosophical conversation between different people from different backgrounds. There is not much happening in this film other than someone dying from “accidentally” walking into a death trap. So, then what is the Cube? Is it Big Brother’s creation? Is it part of the government experimentation, or even scarier–the works of aliens? Or perhaps, is there no one operating the Cube? Does it exist because it just happens? Lastly, is it some twisted rich man’s form of entertainment? There’s no clear answer to what the Cube is but I do know what one of the characters thinks about the world:

“[Outside the Cube is] boundless human stupidity.”

– David Worth

P.S.

I haven’t seen the remaining movies (Cube2Hypercube and Cube Zero) from this series, so I am excited to learn more about it! However, I have recently watched the Japanese remake version of the Cube, which is pretty decent.

My Incoherent Review of Lady Snowblood

My apologies to my readers for missing a post last week. Online has become so loud and toxic that I noticed some of that negativity is showing up in the blogosphere. So, I took a short break from reading blogs and blogging to play Hollow Knight for my mental health’s sake. I was meaning to publish this review last Sunday but I had a hard time editing and polishing it up. Hopefully, my thoughts of the film make sense. Still feel that it’s not refined enough and I could elaborate more but then it will never be published!!! So here it goes…

Imagine a droplet of blood dripping one by one onto the clean white snow. Tell me what do you see? Do you see a Japanese flag? I want to say Lady Snowblood is a revenge story filled with death and bloody scenes. It is, but it’s more than that. Dig a little bit deeper, you’d find a nationalistic film that opposes western thoughts on greed and expansion. Wait…no I am simplifying it–it’s not a nationalist film, but more about corruption from outside influences. You can draw xenophobia from this film. However, I think most people would agree that corrupted officials can make a country bleed when money is involved. I wonder though… is money the root of all evil? Money is only as evil as the person who wields the weapon. That’s just my two cents as an outsider. Despite my opinion, I enjoyed the film for its artistic and poetic aspects. I like the color choices. You see the color red and white throughout the film which are used to enhance the revenge plot. If you are not familiar with the plot, it’s about a young lady who was born to avenge the death of her mother’s husband and her half-brother (Wikipedia summarized the plot incorrectly).

In the opening of the film, we see snow falling outside the window’s cell while female prisoners dressed in red, huddling together around a woman who has just given birth to a baby girl named Yuki, starring Meiko Kaji, the female protagonist. Instantly, I feel the coldness of the plot aligning with Yuki’s character. Another scene where the color red and white are used is when her mother’s husband gets stabbed in broad daylight for wearing a white suit. According to the pheasants, people in white suits are pawns of the government. The scene is so dramatic that it left an impression on me. Blood starts squirting and spilling onto the husband’s perfectly white suit in a flash. Moments ago, I saw a happy family taking a lovely walk in the woods. It’s a powerful scene along with the raging waves of the blue ocean. Like the flick of the Katana, everything is so sharp and happens quickly. Each scene and shot fall into perfect sync. I also like how Yuki drifts like a snowflake in the cold winter’s air, slaughtering the bad guys in the name of justice. More than anything, I empathize with the strong female lead taking justice into her hands with a blade! Karma can define one’s destiny. In Yuki’s case, she was born for revenge. She was born to avenge for the powerless people who are made to suffer under the hands of greedy officials. Overall, it’s a nice revenge film with a subtle hint of political criticism.

P.S.

I couldn’t find a decent trailer for this film, but it’s worth getting the Criterion Collection. It’s one of those films you’d want to watch over and over because it’s just that pretty.

Ran Review (1985)

Subscribe to continue reading

Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.

Reflecting on A Taxi Driver (2017)

Ordinary people are not often praised in society as heroes because they don’t go out into the world expecting recognition. Some are thrown into the situation and fate just decided for them. In this suspenseful chilling, heart-warming story, we follow a taxi driver from Seoul and a German reporter to uncover the reality of the Kwangju Uprising. So, brace yourself because you are going to go on one hell of a ride. Well, I went into this film blind and was moved to tears. Okay, I confess I recognized the actor, Song Kang-ho from Parasite (2019) and I liked it that’s the only reason why I watched this film apart from having a soft spot for political historical films. 

Before we start, let’s get some history lessons out of the way. It’s really important to understand this historic event since this film is based on the event, which I recall my world history textbook only mentioned briefly or didn’t mention at all. I just don’t remember. I’m not a history buff. So, if you are like me, we need a refresher: 

The Kwangju Rising is an event that took place from May 18th to 27th of 1980. The time when South Korea’s dictatorship-long era ends. However, it did not transition from an authoritarian to a democratic society smoothly. General Chum Doo-hwan, the head of the military coup seized power, which only intensified the people’s need for democracy. As a result, many innocent lives have been taken during the protest against martial law. 

Sounds pretty intense, doesn’t it? Well, I used to live in downtown Seattle where protests happen frequently. I was always on the edge. I didn’t realize how physically and mentally draining it is to witness protests almost every other weekend for years! And the local news media didn’t help to ease my mind. It tends to exaggerate current events for dramatic effects because that’s what viewers like–bad news. However, in some cases, some countries do the opposite. They minimize the severity of the situation, which is what made the Kwangju Uprising so terrifying for those who value democracy. And yet, for such an intense event, the director, Jang Hoon chose to explain the event in a light-hearted way, with which the average person can empathize. We follow a story of an ordinary family man who works as a taxi driver, trying to make a living to support his 11-year-old daughter. Like most people, he doesn’t care to meddle in politics until the money is involved. A German foreigner offered a large sum of money to a taxi driver to take him to Kwangju. Throughout the film, gradually you can see the taxi driver growing into someone who thinks less about himself but more about the well-being of the general mass.  

Without spoiling too much of the film, one thing this film has shown me is what true democracy looks like. It’s full of vibrant colors, and sentimental people who are in tune with human dignity such as cooperation and respect for human life. Therefore, I was indeed rooting for the taxi driver and his cute, lime green car to save South Korea from being swallowed up by the big black van, which is a metaphor for the oppressive government whose heart is so black that it felt no remorse to run over its people and lied to its citizens of the uprising death toll. People deserve to know the truth. Do not hide it. In the end, the taxi driver did his job well–drove his passenger to his destination as promised to Kwangju. But did he do it for money? You’d be surprised. Money doesn’t always guarantee first-class customer service. It is in the heart of the driver that determines it.

 A Taxi Driver gave me a little history lesson on South Korea and I enjoyed the ride the entire way. But don’t take my word for it. You should try calling the cab and see it for yourself. Hopefully, you got one with a big heart.

Film Review: An Education (2009)

Subscribe to continue reading

Subscribe to get access to the rest of this post and other subscriber-only content.